
Select the correct Vilshany location
The official Ukrainian territorial Codifier dated 7 July 2026 lists 4 territorial options for Vilshany (Вільшани). Compare settlement type, region, district and community before choosing an administrative service centre.
Names below follow the Ukrainian Codifier, with Latin transliterations for navigation. A catalogue link identifies an exact public record match; listing counts are not counts of operating offices. Read the destination card’s reception address and notices before travelling. A registry identity does not establish current operation, telephone service, opening hours, appointments or availability of a particular service.
Zakarpatska Oblast
Vilshany — village
Zakarpatska Oblast · Khustskyi district · Drahivska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA21120090020098039.
No exact confirmed match to a public catalogue listing. This does not establish that the community has no CNAP or reception service.
Luhanska Oblast
Vilshany — village
Luhanska Oblast · Svativskyi district · Lozno-Oleksandrivska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA44100070040092911.
No exact confirmed match to a public catalogue listing. This does not establish that the community has no CNAP or reception service.
Kharkivska Oblast
Vilshany — settlement
Kharkivska Oblast · Kharkivskyi district · Solonytsivska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA63120250020016357.
Catalogue listings for this location.
- Remote administrative service point — Tsentralna/Veterynarna, 4/1 (SN20000114) — Tsentralna/Veterynarna, 4/1, settlement Vilshany, Solonytsivska territorial community, Kharkiv Oblast.
Khmelnytska Oblast
Vilshany — village
Khmelnytska Oblast · Khmelnytskyi district · Volochyska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA68040090080018795.
No exact confirmed match to a public catalogue listing. This does not establish that the community has no CNAP or reception service.
Source
Official Ukrainian territorial Codifier, the edition under Order 1321 of 7 July 2026. Territorial identities and catalogue links were compared. Geographic matching does not confirm reception at every institution.