Select the correct Zhukiv location
The official Ukrainian territorial Codifier dated 7 July 2026 lists 4 territorial options for Zhukiv (Жуків). Compare settlement type, region, district and community before choosing an administrative service centre.
Names below follow the Ukrainian Codifier, with Latin transliterations for navigation. A catalogue link identifies an exact public record match; listing counts are not counts of operating offices. Read the destination card’s reception address and notices before travelling. A registry identity does not establish current operation, telephone service, opening hours, appointments or availability of a particular service.
Ivano-Frankivska Oblast
Zhukiv — village
Ivano-Frankivska Oblast · Ivano-Frankivskyi district · Obertynska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA26040230060087037.
No exact confirmed match to a public catalogue listing. This does not establish that the community has no CNAP or reception service.
Lvivska Oblast
Zhukiv — village
Lvivska Oblast · Zolochivskyi district · Pomorianska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA46040130040023508.
Catalogue listings for this location.
- Remote administrative service point — St. Tsentralna, 15 (SN13000550) — St. Tsentralna, 15, village Zhukiv, Pomorianska territorial community, Lviv Oblast.
Ternopilska Oblast
Zhukiv — village
Ternopilska Oblast · Ternopilskyi district · Berezhanska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA61040030060077873.
Catalogue listings for this location.
- Remote administrative service point — maidan Prosvity, Zhukiv (SN19000338) — maidan Prosvity, Zhukiv, Berezhanska, Ternopil Oblast.
Khmelnytska Oblast
Zhukiv — village
Khmelnytska Oblast · Shepetivskyi district · Ulashanivska community. Ukrainian territory code (KATOTTG): UA68060310080087741.
No exact confirmed match to a public catalogue listing. This does not establish that the community has no CNAP or reception service.
Source
Official Ukrainian territorial Codifier, the edition under Order 1321 of 7 July 2026. Territorial identities and catalogue links were compared. Geographic matching does not confirm reception at every institution.